Building Guardrails into Your Engineering Workflows

AI guardrails are safety mechanisms designed to control and validate the output of artificial intelligence systems, especially Large Language Models (LLMs). They act as a set of rules, checks, and balances to ensure that AI-generated content is accurate, relevant, and safe before it reaches an end-user or is used in a critical process. As AI becomes more integrated into engineering workflows and customer-facing products, guardrails are essential for mitigating the risks of so-called “AI hallucinations”—instances where the model generates incorrect, nonsensical, or harmful information.

These guardrails can take many forms, including:

• Confidence scoring to measure the AI’s certainty.
• Automated validation tests to check for factual accuracy or formatting.
• Human-in-the-loop (HITL) workflows to involve people in reviewing and approving AI output.

By implementing these checks, development teams can build more reliable and trustworthy AI-powered features.

AI guardrails work by creating a structured validation process that intercepts and evaluates an AI’s output before it’s put to use. This process typically involves a combination of automated checks and human oversight, creating a layered defense against erroneous or unexpected results.

A typical workflow with guardrails might look like this:

1. Initial prompt and generation: A user or system sends a prompt to an LLM, which generates a response.
2. Automated checks: The AI’s output is first passed through a series of automated filters. These can include checking for a minimum confidence score, scanning for forbidden keywords or topics, validating against a known data source, or ensuring the output adheres to a specific format (like JSON or XML).
3. Heuristics and business rules: The output is then checked against predefined business logic. For example, if an AI is generating a product description, a rule might verify that the stated price falls within an acceptable range or that the features mentioned actually exist.
4. Human-in-the-loop review: If the automated checks raise a flag, or if the task is particularly sensitive, the output is routed to a human for review. This person can then approve, edit, or reject the AI-generated content. This step is crucial for nuanced or high-stakes decisions where context and judgment are key.
5. Logging and monitoring: All outcomes—both successful and failed—are logged. This data is invaluable for monitoring the AI’s performance over time and for fine-tuning the model and the guardrails themselves.

This multi-step validation ensures that by the time the AI’s output is delivered, it has been thoroughly vetted for quality, accuracy, and safety.

Guardrails are crucial because they build a necessary layer of trust and safety between a powerful but fallible technology and the real-world applications it drives. While LLMs are incredibly capable, they are not infallible. They can and do make mistakes, and the consequences of those mistakes can range from trivial to catastrophic.

Here’s why implementing guardrails is a non-negotiable for most software products:

• Protecting brand reputation: Inaccurate or inappropriate AI-generated content delivered to customers can quickly damage a company’s credibility.
• Ensuring operational consistency: When AI is used for internal processes like summarizing reports or generating code, guardrails ensure the output is reliable and consistent, preventing costly errors.
• Reducing security risks: Guardrails can prevent a model from being manipulated into revealing sensitive information or executing harmful instructions, a technique known as prompt injection.
• Improving the user experience: By filtering out low-quality or nonsensical responses, guardrails ensure that users have a more positive and productive interaction with AI features.

Ultimately, guardrails allow teams to harness the power of AI with confidence, knowing that they have a system in place to catch and correct errors before they cause problems.

While essential, creating effective AI guardrails comes with its own set of challenges. It’s not as simple as flipping a switch; it requires thoughtful design and ongoing maintenance.

Some of the most common hurdles include:

• Balancing safety and speed: Overly strict guardrails can create bottlenecks, especially if too many tasks are flagged for manual review. This can slow down workflows and frustrate users. The key is to find the right balance between automated checks and human intervention.
• Defining “good” and “bad” output: It can be difficult to create hard and fast rules for what constitutes an acceptable AI response. Quality can be subjective, and the criteria for success often depend on the specific use case.
• The cost of human review: Implementing a human-in-the-loop system requires a dedicated team of reviewers. This adds operational overhead and can be expensive to scale.
• Keeping up with evolving models: As AI models become more advanced, the types of errors they make can change. Guardrails need to be continuously updated and refined to remain effective.

Building a robust system of AI guardrails is an iterative process. Here are some best practices to guide you as you design and implement your own safety checks.

Begin by identifying the highest-risk areas of your application. Where would an AI error cause the most damage? Focus your initial efforts there. For example, an AI that generates legal clauses requires much stricter guardrails than one that suggests creative blog post titles. Define clear, simple rules first and build complexity over time.

Don’t rely exclusively on automation or human review. The most effective systems use a hybrid approach.

• Use automation for objective checks: Let machines handle what they do best—validating data formats, checking against known facts, and scanning for keywords.
• Use humans for subjective judgment: Reserve human oversight for nuanced, high-stakes, or ambiguous cases where context is critical.

Most LLMs can provide a confidence score along with their output. Use this score as a first-pass filter. Set a threshold for what is considered a “high-confidence” response that can be approved automatically, and route lower-confidence responses to a human reviewer.

Keep detailed logs of all AI outputs, the results of guardrail checks, and any human edits or approvals. This data is a goldmine. Use it to:

• Monitor AI performance: Track how often the AI is right, how often it’s wrong, and in what ways.
• Fine-tune your models: Use the corrected outputs as training data to improve the accuracy of your AI over time.
• Refine your guardrails: Analyze where your guardrails are succeeding and where they are failing to make them more effective.

While Kinde is not an AI platform, its features for authorization and user management are foundational for building secure AI guardrails, especially human-in-the-loop workflows.

• Permissions and roles: Kinde allows you to define granular user permissions. You can create a specific role—for example, “AI Content Reviewer”—and grant only users with that role the ability to access the review queue and approve or reject AI-generated content. This ensures that only trusted individuals can perform this critical function.
• Secure workflows: By integrating Kinde’s authentication and authorization into your AI application, you can build secure workflows that safely route sensitive tasks between automated systems and human reviewers, ensuring that every step is properly authenticated.

By managing who can do what, Kinde helps you build the human part of your human-in-the-loop system with confidence.

• Manage roles and permissions
• About organizations