An AI-powered spec workflow uses artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), to translate a user story or issue ticket from a project management tool like Jira into a detailed technical specification, and then into functional, tested code. This modern approach streamlines the development process, reducing manual translation steps and accelerating the time it takes to get from an idea to a deployable feature.
Instead of a product manager, an engineer, and a QA analyst sequentially translating a requirement, an AI acts as a collaborative partner. It helps flesh out the details, generate boilerplate code, and create initial tests, freeing up the development team to focus on complex logic, architecture, and user experience.
The process transforms a high-level requirement into production-ready code through several automated and human-supervised steps. It’s a collaborative cycle between the developer and the AI, where the AI handles the heavy lifting of generation and the developer provides the critical thinking, context, and oversight.
Here’s a typical breakdown of the workflow:
- Start with a clear user story: The foundation of the entire process is a well-written user story or Jira ticket. The ticket should clearly define the user, the goal, and the reason, following a standard format like, “As a [user type], I want to [perform an action] so that I can [achieve a benefit].” Crucially, it should also include clear, testable acceptance criteria.
- Generate a technical specification: The developer feeds the user story into an AI model. They prompt the AI to act as a software architect or senior engineer and ask it to generate a technical specification. This spec might include:
- API endpoint definitions (e.g.,
POST /api/v1/users/{id}/profile
) - Data schema or model changes
- Required business logic and validation rules
- Potential edge cases and error handling
- A list of necessary unit and integration tests
- API endpoint definitions (e.g.,
- Write code and tests from the spec: With a confirmed specification, the developer then prompts the AI to generate the actual code. For instance, “Using Node.js and Express, write the controller, service, and data access layer for the API endpoints defined in the spec.” Simultaneously, they prompt it to write corresponding tests based on the acceptance criteria.
- Review, refine, and integrate: The AI-generated code is a first draft, not a final product. The developer’s most important role is to review this output for correctness, security, and performance. They run the generated tests, debug any issues, and refactor the code to fit existing architectural patterns and coding standards. This human-in-the-loop step is non-negotiable and ensures quality and consistency.
This iterative process of generating, reviewing, and refining continues until the feature is complete and ready for integration.
This AI-assisted workflow is not just for building simple features. It has broad applications across the software development lifecycle, helping teams move faster and maintain high standards.
- Rapid prototyping: Quickly transform product ideas into working prototypes to gather user feedback or secure stakeholder buy-in.
- Accelerating feature development: Generate the boilerplate for new features, such as CRUD APIs or UI components, allowing engineers to focus on the unique, complex aspects of the task.
- Standardizing bug fixes: For a well-documented bug, an AI can suggest a code fix along with a regression test to verify the solution and prevent future occurrences.
- Improving documentation: AI can generate API documentation, code comments, and even user-facing guides based on the code and its initial specification.
These applications all share a common theme: augmenting the developer’s capabilities to produce value more efficiently.
While powerful, this workflow is not a silver bullet. It’s essential to understand its limitations and common misconceptions to apply it effectively.
The biggest misconception is that AI will replace developers. In reality, this workflow makes the developer more critical than ever. It shifts their focus from writing routine code to making high-level architectural decisions, ensuring security, and providing the business context that AI lacks. The AI is a powerful pair programmer, not a replacement.
Common challenges include:
- Context is king: AI models lack awareness of your specific codebase, architectural patterns, and business nuances. The quality of the output is directly proportional to the quality of the context you provide.
- Security and quality assurance: AI-generated code can introduce subtle bugs or security vulnerabilities. It must be subjected to the same rigorous code reviews, security scans, and quality assurance processes as human-written code.
- Over-reliance on the tool: Teams must be careful not to become too dependent on the AI for problem-solving. Core engineering skills and a deep understanding of the system remain paramount.
To get the most out of an AI-powered spec workflow, it’s best to follow a few key principles that keep the developer in control and the process grounded in solid engineering practices.
- Garbage in, garbage out: Start with exceptionally clear and detailed user stories. Use a structured format like Gherkin (
Given-When-Then
) for acceptance criteria to provide unambiguous instructions for the AI. - Provide architectural context: When prompting the AI, feed it relevant information. This can include existing data models, API design patterns, and snippets of related code to ensure the output is consistent with your existing system.
- Iterate in small steps: Don’t try to generate an entire application in one prompt. Break the problem down. Generate the spec first. Review it. Then generate the code for one part of the spec. Review that. This iterative loop makes the process manageable and keeps you in control.
- Treat the AI as a junior developer: The AI is a highly productive but inexperienced team member. It needs clear instructions, close supervision, and mentorship. Review its work with a critical eye, provide feedback, and guide it toward the correct implementation.
By adopting these practices, you can successfully integrate AI into your workflow to build better software faster.
While Kinde does not directly participate in the AI code generation process, it provides the essential, well-documented infrastructure that makes AI-powered workflows effective, especially when dealing with authentication, authorization, and user management.
When a Jira ticket involves features like “user registration,” “role-based access control,” or “organization management,” an AI can be prompted to use Kinde’s APIs and SDKs to implement these complex and security-critical functionalities. Because Kinde’s documentation is clear and its APIs are predictable, an LLM can easily generate code that correctly integrates with Kinde for:
- Authentication: Implementing social sign-in, passwordless login, or enterprise SSO.
- User Management: Creating, updating, and managing users and their permissions.
- Feature Flags: Controlling feature access based on user roles or organization settings.
By handling these foundational elements, Kinde allows developers and their AI assistants to focus on the core application logic described in the Jira ticket, confident that the security and identity components are handled by a robust, dedicated service.
Get started now
Boost security, drive conversion and save money — in just a few minutes.