Semantic prompt caching is a technique used to reduce latency and computational cost in AI applications by storing the results of previous prompts and reusing them for similar future requests. Unlike traditional caching, which relies on exact matches, semantic caching uses vector embeddings to identify and serve cached responses for prompts that are contextually similar, even if they aren’t worded identically. This approach is particularly effective for applications that handle a high volume of repetitive or closely related user queries.

This caching strategy can be implemented at various layers of your application, including:

• Prompt layer: Caching the direct response to a user’s prompt.
• Retrieval layer: Caching the results of a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system.
• Final answer layer: Caching the fully generated response after all processing is complete.

The core idea is to intercept a request, check the cache for a semantically similar entry, and return the cached result if it meets a certain similarity threshold. This avoids the need to re-process the request, saving both time and money.

The cache-then-fan-out pattern is a sophisticated approach to semantic caching that balances performance with accuracy. It works by creating a tiered system of fallbacks, starting with the fastest and cheapest option and progressively moving to more complex and expensive ones. Here’s a breakdown of the typical workflow:

1. Try the cache: When a new prompt is received, the system first generates a vector embedding of the prompt and searches the cache for a similar entry. If a sufficiently similar result is found (based on a predefined similarity threshold), it is returned immediately.
2. Single model execution: If the cache misses, the prompt is sent to a single, fast, and cost-effective AI model. The response is then returned to the user and stored in the cache for future use.
3. Narrow fan-out: If the single model fails or produces a low-quality response, the system can escalate to a “narrow fan-out” approach. This involves sending the prompt to a small, curated ensemble of different models simultaneously. The first valid response is used, and the others are discarded.
4. Wide fan-out: As a final resort, if the narrow fan-out also fails, the system can employ a “wide fan-out.” This involves sending the prompt to a larger, more diverse set of models, including more powerful and specialized ones. This increases the likelihood of getting a high-quality response, albeit at a higher cost and latency.

This tiered approach ensures that most requests are handled by the most efficient means possible, while still providing a robust fallback for more challenging prompts.

Implementing a semantic caching strategy like cache-then-fan-out offers several significant benefits, especially for applications at scale:

• Reduced latency: By serving responses from a cache, you can dramatically reduce the time it takes for users to get a response. This is crucial for maintaining a positive user experience, especially in real-time applications.
• Lower operational costs: Caching responses reduces the number of calls to expensive AI models, directly cutting down on your operational expenses. This can be a game-changer for applications with a high volume of similar queries.
• Increased scalability: By offloading a significant portion of requests to the cache, your system can handle a much higher volume of traffic without needing to scale up your AI model infrastructure.
• Improved consistency: Caching can help ensure that users receive consistent answers to similar questions, which can be important for applications that provide factual information or follow specific guidelines.

To get the most out of your semantic caching system, consider the following best practices:

• Set appropriate similarity thresholds: The similarity threshold determines how closely a new prompt must match a cached prompt to be considered a hit. A threshold that is too low will result in irrelevant responses, while one that is too high will lead to a low cache-hit rate. You’ll need to experiment to find the optimal balance for your specific use case.
• Implement staleness TTLs: To ensure that your cached data doesn’t become outdated, set a “time-to-live” (TTL) for your cache entries. This will automatically purge old entries, ensuring that your users are always receiving fresh and relevant information.
• Defend against cache poisoning: Cache poisoning occurs when incorrect or malicious data is entered into your cache. To prevent this, you can implement validation checks on the responses before they are cached. You can also monitor your cache for unusual patterns or a sudden drop in response quality.
• Use a tiered fallback system: As described in the cache-then-fan-out pattern, a tiered system of fallbacks ensures that you can handle a wide range of prompts efficiently while maintaining a high level of accuracy.

Implementing a sophisticated caching strategy like cache-then-fan-out often involves rolling out changes incrementally and testing their impact. Kinde’s feature flags are an excellent tool for managing this process.

With Kinde, you can create feature flags to control different aspects of your caching logic. For example, you could use a string flag to define which caching strategy to use (“simple”, “semantic”, “fan-out”) or a boolean flag to turn caching on or off entirely for a specific set of users. This allows you to:

• A/B test different caching strategies: Roll out a new caching algorithm to a small subset of your users and compare its performance against your existing setup.
• Gradually roll out changes: Safely introduce new features by enabling them for internal teams first, then for a small group of beta testers, and finally for your entire user base.
• Quickly disable problematic features: If a new caching strategy introduces unforeseen issues, you can instantly disable it with the flip of a switch, without needing to redeploy your application.

By using Kinde’s feature flags, you can de-risk the process of implementing and optimizing your caching system, ensuring that you can iterate quickly and confidently.

• About feature flags
• Manage feature flags